Page - 1 Volume 6 , Issue 5 Dt - 01-05-2006 | ENB History | Home | Page 2
 

SIMS CONDUCTS FIRST EVER ICE NAVIGATION COURSE IN INDIA
EXCLUSIVE ICE NAVIGATION FACILITY AND COURSE APPROVED BY BP GETS ROLLING FROM 20TH APRIL, 2006

It’s indeed another feather in the cap of Samundra institute of maritime studies for introducing such a sophisticated bridge simulation course for our in-house trainees by far not available in India or any other Asian country. It was a result of months long meticulous planning, hard work and spirited efforts by the faculty as well as the staff from ESM together with the software developer to bring this unique facility come into reality. Congratulations and well done to all of you!

The two-day  course which  concluded on 20th April 2006 was attended by Capt. Chris Durman (Ice Adviser, BP Shipping), along with some of our masters and chief officers. A very pleased Capt Chris Durman commented that the course was very well conducted and he was very impressed with the simulator exercises. The other attendees who found the course very informative and interesting were equally satisfied.

The course consists of theory classes combined with practical exercise sessions on the ice simulator that is integrated with nine different ship models including icebreaker. About 20 simulated exercises include sailing areas such as Kattegat and St. Petersburg providing a virtual experience of these areas dur-

ing the winter months. The exercises which will no doubt provide the participants full confidence to navigate in ice in their future assignments on board include ice edge approach, unassisted passage in different types and forms of ice, convoy passage, manoeuvring in ice channel etc. both in day and night navigation. A snow fall incorporated in the simulator indeed makes it fabulously realistic almost causes them to shiver in cold !


From Left: Capt. R. Wadhwan,Capt. Rakesh Trehan, Capt. Binoy Kumar Dubey, Capt. Chris Durman and Mr. Sunil K. Chouhan

*Note: This monthly safety moment is collected from various sources for educational purpose and is not an actual incident from the ESM fleet.

AGROUND DUE TO HIGH SPEED

A 23,000 tonne double hull chemical/oil tanker, carrying 16,300 tonnes of low sulphur fuel oil arrived early and anchored, with the pilot booked for 1315 the following day. On his last visit nearly 10 months ago, the vessel had entered close to high water while this time it was 1 hour before low water. Hence the tide was setting north-easterly instead of to the south-west.

Anchorage was 10 miles from pilot embarkation point. However, anchor was aweigh only at 1235 and in spite of a maximum speed of 14 knots, making the pilot at 1315 was difficult. A delay meant postponement of berthing. The force 6 westerly wind and the tide were both unfavourable and the vessel proceeded at full speed on a course of 262, monitored by VTS, who requested the pilot ladder on the starboard side. The prevailing wind was virtually right ahead and the designated

pilot area had sufficient room for making lee. However the ship speed, in spite of the tidal stream and head wind, caused the vessel to overshoot the boarding point, entering the channel close to a shoal area.

The vessel had set north of planned track unobserved, OOW was on deck to meet the pilot and the master was unable to effectively monitor the vessel’s position. 20 minutes behind boarding schedule, the pilot boat observed the high approach speed and called the vessel to slow down and swing to starboard for providing lee. Master did so without appreciating the very close proximity of the shoal patch. As soon as the pilot boarded, the master swung the vessel back to port, but it was too late – the vessel had grounded.  Being soft mud bottom, she was successfully refloated 2 hours later, without sustaining damage.
LESSONS LEARNT
Always allow sufficient time to properly execute the passage plan. Improper planning led to delayed weighment of anchor.
The bridge team did not appreciate the strength, direction and effect of the tidal stream. Before starting to weigh anchor, it would have been prudent to conduct a short briefing between the key members of the bridge team.

VTS should have been more proactive in monitoring and, if necessary, advising the master of his close proximity to navigational dangers.

The request by the pilot vessel, for a swing to starboard to provide a lee, was inappropriate given the dangers close by.
Page - 1 Volume 6 , Issue 5 Dt - 01-05-2006 | ENB History | Home | Page 2