October 2006 | Page - 10
[<<Prev] 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 [Next>>]
 

DRASTIC SUMMER THAW IN THE ARCTIC

The drastic 2006 summer thaw in the Arctic region from Svalbard – a Norwegian archipelago about 600 miles from the North Pole – to Alaska has been widely blamed on global warming. An international study also projected that as a result of increased global warming, summer ice in the Arctic could disappear completely by 2100, undermining the livelihoods of the native people and driving creatures such as polar bears towards extinction.

According to the WWF, various wildlife species indigenous to these regions have been drowning due to the recent summer thaw; especially polar bears that live around the fringes of the ice, have reportedly been stranded at sea by the melting ice.

On a more pleasant note, the receding Arctic glaciers have also uncovered three previously unknown islands near Svalbard – the largest about 300 by 100 metres. Researchers envisage the melt may also open up the Arctic to more exploration for oil, gas and minerals, increase fisheries and even open a short-cut shipping route linking the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.

NEW FINDINGS ON THE TITANIC DISASTER
Following a recent National Geographic Channel investigation, new evidence suggests that weak rivets caused the RMS Titanic to sink so quickly that few passengers could be saved from its collision with an iceberg on the calamitous night of 15 April 1912.
Two metallurgists, Dr. Tim Foecke of the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, and Jennifer Hooper McCarty, of Oregon Health and Science University, first developed the rivet theory after examining 48 popped rivets from the wreck. They found that the wrought iron contained 9% slag — a high enough concentration that could have weakened the metal.

To test his theory, Dr. Foecke commissioned a blacksmith to make rivets to the same specifications; these were used to join steel plates such as those used in the Titanic. When stressed in the laboratory, the rivet heads broke at lower loads than expect -
ed. Even a few failures because of flawed metal would have been sufficient to rupture entire seams.

The findings also overturned another popular theory that the ship’s hull ruptured as it was made from brittle steel. According to Dr. Foecke, mechanical tests show adequate fracture toughness in the steel at ice-water temperatures, fairly close to steels used to build bulk carrier vessels today, thus debunking the brittle steel theory.

The iceberg did not cause a gash as a result of plate fracture. Rather, it is reported, a series of bouncing impacts popped open rivets along the bow, causing the hull to “unzip”. With stronger rivets, the Titanic would probably still have sunk but it would have remained afloat for several hours longer and most of the 1,523 people, who died, could have been saved.

 
ENB History | Home
October 2006 | Page - 10
[<<Prev] 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 [Next>>]